It is also the first of Durham’s cases that delves deeply into the origins of the dossier, which Trump derided as fake news and a political witch hunt. “The law doesn't let you rewrite the dictionary,” Onorato said.ĭanchenko is the third person to be prosecuted by special counsel John Durham, who was appointed to investigate the origins of “Crossfire Hurricane” - the designation given to the FBI’s 2016 probe into former president Trump’s Russia connections. If the FBI wanted to know about email exchanges, it should have asked a different question, Onorato said. Indeed, Onorato said, it makes more sense that such a call would have occurred using an Internet app because so many of them conceal the source of the call, and the caller wanted to be anonymous.Īs for the allegations about his discussions with Dolan, Onorato said, Danchenko answered the question truthfully because the two did not “talk” - but rather had a written exchange. The government's case requires jurors to become “mind readers” to assess Danchenko's subjective belief about the source of the phone call, Onorato said.Īnd while phone records may not show a call, Onorato said, the government has no idea whether a call could have been placed with a mobile app rather than a traditional telephone provider. He pointed out that Danchenko never said he was certain that Millian was the source of the anonymous call but that he had good reason to believe it. CNN, which joins recent mea culpas from legacy media outlets like The New York Times and The Washington Post, has much to apologize for. The FBI needed to know that Dolan was an important source for Danchenko, Keilty said, because Dolan is a Democratic operative who has worked on the presidential campaign of every Democratic candidate since Jimmy Carter, and thus would have had motivation to fabricate or embellish allegations against Trump.īut Danchenko's attorney, Danny Onorato, told jurors that his client was completely truthful with the FBI. Dolan over email” about very specific items that showed up in the dossier. But prosecutors say there is evidence that Dolan and Danchenko “spoke with Mr. Have the past four years of Democrats screaming Russian collusion been a complete lie We now know that the information in the debunked Steele Dossier. Prosecutors also say Danchenko lied when he said he never “talked” with a man named Charles Dolan about the allegations contained in the dossier. Prosecutor Michael Keilty told jurors that Danchenko never spoke with Millian and that phone records show he never received an anonymous phone call at the time Danchenko claimed it occurred. ![]() ![]() Specifically, prosecutors say, Danchenko lied when he said he obtained some information in an anonymous phone call from a man he believed to be Sergei Millian, a former head of the Russian-American Chamber of Commerce. Join our hosts as they take you in and out of courtrooms in the U.S. Courthouse News’ podcast Sidebar tackles the stories you need to know from the legal world.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |